We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, analyse site traffic, and personalise content. Choose your preferences below.
Required for the website to function properly. These cannot be disabled.
Enable personalised features like remembering your preferences and settings.
15 minutes - No account needed - Requirement-by-requirement against PCI DSS v4.0.1
Count each service: gateway, tokenisation, fraud, settlement, reconciliation…
Generic AWS cost guides and cloud consultants do not understand payment infrastructure. They flag required PCI DSS headroom as waste. They miss cardholder data scoping issues that QSAs catch immediately. They do not know the difference between a security group rule that is fine and one that fails Requirement 1.
The result: most funded fintechs walk into their first QSA assessment or acquirer conversation without knowing where their gaps are. The gaps exist. They are findable. Finding them late is expensive.
The average fintech that discovers compliance gaps during due diligence loses 3-6 months on its go-live timeline while fixes are made under pressure.
Compliance remediation found during a QSA assessment costs significantly more than the same work done before the engagement starts.
Barclaycard, Worldpay, and Lloyds Cardnet reject fintech applications for gaps you could have found and fixed weeks earlier.
The free assessment tells you exactly what is broken. Membership gives you the assessments, architecture, and expert support to fix it — structured for audit scrutiny from day one.
Run all 26 assessments in simulation mode. Build your evidence pack. See exactly what your QSA and acquirer will ask for — before they ask.
Full access to every assessment: PCI DSS gap analysis, cardholder data flow diagrams, architecture decision records, infrastructure-as-code generation, agent flow simulation, observability packs.
Everything in Sync plus a dedicated Solutions Architect. Monthly reviews and architect-validated artefacts your QSA and acquirer can act on.
Keep the animated UX, but shift the framing toward business outcomes: PCI readiness, acquirer confidence, quantified risk, and architecture decisions that can be defended to engineering, finance, and audit.
This is the payment-stack visual the homepage was missing. It now speaks to operating decisions, not just technical telemetry: where risk sits, what finance can recover, and what engineering needs to tackle next.
See whether the stack is likely to pass scrutiny, where avoidable cost sits, and which architectural decisions still need evidence before launch.
The animations stay intact. What changes is the framing: each step now explains how Sync moves a payments team from uncertainty to a clear remediation and delivery plan.
Start with the commercial and delivery context: payment model, processing footprint, PCI target, go-live timeline, and engineering capacity. The visual stays product-led, but the questions now frame the business risk clearly.
The animated analysis view shows the value well, so that stays. The message shifts to what leadership cares about: which gaps slow down acquirer approval, create remediation cost, or expose control weaknesses before audit.
This is the payment-stack visual you called out. It should read less like a cloud console and more like an executive operating view: compliance readiness, recoverable spend, critical risks, and the next actions that matter.
Keep the consultation animation because the interaction works well, but position it as a working session around evidence, architecture trade-offs, and delivery decisions rather than generic consultancy branding.
The final visual already explains the product well. Framed properly, it becomes a business case: what gets fixed first, what can wait, where savings are real, and how the programme lands without derailing delivery.
No account - No credit card - Results on screen immediately
Most compliance assessments are built for generic cloud environments. Sync Your Cloud is built specifically for fintech payment infrastructure - which means it understands the difference between required PCI DSS burst headroom and genuine waste, what cardholder data environment scoping looks like in your architecture, and what a QSA actually checks.
Not theoretical compliance knowledge. Practical experience from NatWest operations with a clear understanding of how regulated banks are governed and scrutinised.
The current standard including new requirements for automated agent accounts that many compliance assessments still miss.
Output is structured the way Barclaycard, Worldpay, and Lloyds Cardnet expect to receive it - not only technically accurate, but audit-ready.
Three assessments built for payment engineering teams. Run them before you commit to membership.
Know which compliance gaps would fail your QSA assessment or delay your acquirer application - before the conversation starts.
63 controls - PCI DSS v4.0.1 - Req 8.6 for automated agents included
Run Gap AnalysisGet a scored readiness report across 7 critical layers of your payment infrastructure - and see exactly what to fix first.
Orchestration - Security - Compliance - Cost - Observability - Integration - DR
Check Your ScoreThe exact checklist Barclaycard, Worldpay, and Lloyds Cardnet use in due diligence - assessed against your current posture before you apply.
AOC status - Chargeback rate - DR documentation - AML/KYC - Pen testing - Sanctions screening
Assess Your Readiness15 minutes. No account. Requirement-by-requirement against PCI DSS v4.0.1. QSA firms can contact us for partner licensing.
Run Your Free PCI DSS Gap AnalysisIf you are preparing for a QSA assessment, approaching an acquiring bank, or building payment infrastructure on AWS for the first time - a 20-minute conversation costs nothing and might save you months.
No sales pitch. No commitment. Just a straight conversation about your compliance posture.
Actionable guidance for fintech CTOs, VP Engineering leaders, and payment engineers on AWS.
How to integrate agent-driven payment workflows while keeping PCI scope, segregation of duties, and controls clear for audit.
Read insight ->A practical guide to policy boundaries, account-level guardrails, and governance controls that survive QSA scrutiny.
Read insight ->Architecture decisions that reduce remediation loops and help fintech teams enter due diligence with cleaner evidence.
Read insight ->